Posts

school to recycle material and avoid waste

  Some people think that children should be tought at school to recycle material and avoid waste. Other people believe that children should be taught this is at home. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Some people opine that parents should apprise children about recycling, whereas others say that school should do it. This essay intends to analyze both perspectives. I believe that both teachers and parents have to share this responsibility pro-actively. On the one hand, there are many reasons why some people believe that teaching children about recycling should be done at home. Firstly, parents have the opportunity to teach children the importance of recycling early on in life, even before they start school. From a young age, parents can instill in children a strong sense of environmental ethics. Secondly, children spend a lot of time at home, and parents can set a good example by themselves to recycling household items like milk containers, soda cans, juice bottles cardboard box

rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine

  More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.  Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree? The movement of qualified professionals from underdeveloped countries to developed countries is called brain drain. Some people think that this is not good for underdeveloped nations because of this brain drain process. On the other hand, some people believe that this is the natural movement of skilled workers in other countries. In my perspective, it is the need of everyone who is seeking a good lifestyle. There are several reasons for the migration of professional workers from poor countries to rich countries. First of all, the developed nations do not have enough source of skilled workers. Therefore they

Accommodation and transport problems

  Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? In the modernization era, many problems occur in metropolitan cities like accommodation and transport. The movement of an organization from urban to rural areas has become the solution to eradicate such issues. There are a lot of positive and negative outcomes of this. On the one side, it is ridiculous to say that any business can shift from an urban area to the countryside without facing any loss. Firstly, this change may cost a firm due to a reduction in the quality of its workforce. Not each employee is willing to resettle or work there. And they prefer seeking another career in the large city to maintain their current living standards. The enterprises would have to hire local workers who are, indeed,  less competent. The expenses for the mandatory training courses are significant to them. But an improvement in their prof

big cities face several problems

People living in big cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns?   In recent times, most people like to live in urban areas. Individuals of the  metropolitan  city face various difficulties like crime, pollution, and health disease. From my perspective, the government should apply some norms to mitigate the preceding problems. The  predominant  cause to live in city places is a crime. In highly populated areas, the risk of encountering a crowd is much higher than in a small town. Additionally, if the culprit feels protected by the  anonymity  that a large city provides, he may  perpetrate  more wrongdoings. Furthermore, air pollution is also a prevalent issue in major cities. Surface transportation is the  predominan t source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause respiratory problems to the people. This problem is made worse by the  utter  number of vehicles commuting daily in the city.   The government should

Despite the warning, many people do so

  Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and that people must limit the use of energy in their daily lives. Despite the warning, many people do not do so.  What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to protect the environment?  For many years, Scientists are warning people to protect the environment and reduce the daily consumption of energy sources. Also, warn the society about the adverse outcomes of pollutants present in the surround. Unluckily, the public does not care about this issue. There are numerous causes for it and also have some useful solutions to mitigate this burning problem. The main reason for the current use of energy fuels is lack of knowledge. In recent times, everyone has indulged in the usage of electric appliances and other electrically operated machines such as microwave, oven, and so on. Such devices make life more convenient than in the past time. They use such things in their daily routines and do n

a lot of buildings

  Nowadays, a lot of buildings, such as offices and schools, are now being built with an open plan design.  Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development? In the present era, the majority of education institutes and offices would form with open-space floor plans in their premises rather than having individual cabinet rooms. This idea is to be invited because of its pros. But, I will explain the positive and adverse effects of such development. The main reason for the open floor structure because of its cost-effectiveness. Therefore, all recommended these types of plans by organizations and institutions. A huge investment is involved in constructing separate cabinets, and in an open design, only the furniture is to be setup. This furnishing works will incur only fewer expenses. Furthermore, such a structure at offices will eliminate the discrimination of staff members. All the staff members irrespective of their grades should sit together at the same place. This a

non-veg for a healthy diet

 Everyone should become vegetarian because there is no need for non-veg for a healthy diet. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In the present era, leading a healthy life is possible by eating plant-based foods. We have no right to kill animals for our diet. Therefore, I firmly agree with the opinion that everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet. There are myriad benefits to following a vegetarian diet. plants-based foods are rich in vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other nutrients required for good health. According to a report, vegetarians are less likely to develop health problems like obesity, cancer, or heart causes. Health benefits are not the only reason to follow a vegetarian diet. When we obtain our food from plants, we can also stop cruelty to animals. By contrast, non-vegetarian foods such as fish and meat are high in cholesterol, fat, and calories. A person's threat of cancer and cardio diseases may increase by the daily intake of these food items. Besides, unl