13

-

    Some people think that current environment issues are global problems and should therefore be dealt with by the government while others believe that these problems can only be tackled by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It is true that whether they should originate the solutions to from authorities or individuals is a subject of debate. While it can give reasons to justify the former statement, the latter one is much more preferable.
On the one side, there are compelling reasons to think that governments play a crucial role in mitigating environmental problems. Firstly, these issues are considered as market failures that need to be intervened by the national and local authorities. The environment is marked as a public convenience. As a result, by imposing green taxes, the government could make the environment better. Secondly, the government could encourage green business which has not reached high productivity. For example, sustainable farming is the best example for this point as farmers have to face difficulties from low productivity at the early stage.
On the other side, others would argue that individuals play a more vital role in enhancing the quality of the environment. The first prominent reason is that the intervention of the government will not equal to the better environment if there are not any appropriate consumption behaviors. For instance, only when individuals are aware of how much plastic he or she is consuming, it will save marine creatures. Moreover, without the demand for green products, the businesses of sustainable sectors could not maintain their operation no matter how much it spends no matter.
In conclusion, although environment-related awareness has increased, the behaviors towards sustainability still do not occur. There is a gap between the attitude and behavior of purchasers which needs to be paid more attention by themselves.

Popular posts from this blog

Accommodation and transport problems

-
  Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? In the modernization era, many problems occur in metropolitan cities like accommodation and transport. The movement of an organization from urban to rural areas has become the solution to eradicate such issues. There are a lot of positive and negative outcomes of this. On the one side, it is ridiculous to say that any business can shift from an urban area to the countryside without facing any loss. Firstly, this change may cost a firm due to a reduction in the quality of its workforce. Not each employee is willing to resettle or work there. And they prefer seeking another career in the large city to maintain their current living standards. The enterprises would have to hire local workers who are, indeed,  less competent. The expenses for the mandatory training courses are significant to them. But an improvement in their prof
Read more

a lot of buildings

-
  Nowadays, a lot of buildings, such as offices and schools, are now being built with an open plan design.  Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development? In the present era, the majority of education institutes and offices would form with open-space floor plans in their premises rather than having individual cabinet rooms. This idea is to be invited because of its pros. But, I will explain the positive and adverse effects of such development. The main reason for the open floor structure because of its cost-effectiveness. Therefore, all recommended these types of plans by organizations and institutions. A huge investment is involved in constructing separate cabinets, and in an open design, only the furniture is to be setup. This furnishing works will incur only fewer expenses. Furthermore, such a structure at offices will eliminate the discrimination of staff members. All the staff members irrespective of their grades should sit together at the same place. This a
Read more

big cities face several problems

-
People living in big cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns?   In recent times, most people like to live in urban areas. Individuals of the  metropolitan  city face various difficulties like crime, pollution, and health disease. From my perspective, the government should apply some norms to mitigate the preceding problems. The  predominant  cause to live in city places is a crime. In highly populated areas, the risk of encountering a crowd is much higher than in a small town. Additionally, if the culprit feels protected by the  anonymity  that a large city provides, he may  perpetrate  more wrongdoings. Furthermore, air pollution is also a prevalent issue in major cities. Surface transportation is the  predominan t source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause respiratory problems to the people. This problem is made worse by the  utter  number of vehicles commuting daily in the city.   The government should
Read more