illegal to reject someone applying for a job,why??

-
In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his age. Do you think this a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, many nations, various people are rejected by some jobs illegally, Because of their age. I thought it is a negative development to society and for the country.

If people do not have jobs, who can do, the unemployment rate raises eventually. In such cases, the government becomes helpless to fix such stern. Occupations are the main source of income for middle-class families. To illustrates, in various families, there is one person who earns money to fulfill their family member’s needs. If such persons face unemployment, their families will suffer from various detrimental effects. Thus, the social conditions of these families become worst.

The increased unemployment rate gives adverse effects on the government. When persons who do not any job, it reduces the production of the country. As a result, the economic condition becomes unfavourable and the GDP of the country will start falling. According to a recent report, one of the most reasons behind the upsurge of the GDP is the low level of the unemployment rate. People are more helpful to boost economic conditions. Moreover, a country where social issues are present at least level, there, improvement in economic status shifts automatically.

In conclusion, work is vital to people as well as authorizes and both are attached. If people have a job or not, the economic conditions of any country bowed or declined dramatically.  

Popular posts from this blog

Accommodation and transport problems

-
  Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? In the modernization era, many problems occur in metropolitan cities like accommodation and transport. The movement of an organization from urban to rural areas has become the solution to eradicate such issues. There are a lot of positive and negative outcomes of this. On the one side, it is ridiculous to say that any business can shift from an urban area to the countryside without facing any loss. Firstly, this change may cost a firm due to a reduction in the quality of its workforce. Not each employee is willing to resettle or work there. And they prefer seeking another career in the large city to maintain their current living standards. The enterprises would have to hire local workers who are, indeed,  less competent. The expenses for the mandatory training courses are significant to them. But an improvement in their prof
Read more

a lot of buildings

-
  Nowadays, a lot of buildings, such as offices and schools, are now being built with an open plan design.  Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development? In the present era, the majority of education institutes and offices would form with open-space floor plans in their premises rather than having individual cabinet rooms. This idea is to be invited because of its pros. But, I will explain the positive and adverse effects of such development. The main reason for the open floor structure because of its cost-effectiveness. Therefore, all recommended these types of plans by organizations and institutions. A huge investment is involved in constructing separate cabinets, and in an open design, only the furniture is to be setup. This furnishing works will incur only fewer expenses. Furthermore, such a structure at offices will eliminate the discrimination of staff members. All the staff members irrespective of their grades should sit together at the same place. This a
Read more

big cities face several problems

-
People living in big cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns?   In recent times, most people like to live in urban areas. Individuals of the  metropolitan  city face various difficulties like crime, pollution, and health disease. From my perspective, the government should apply some norms to mitigate the preceding problems. The  predominant  cause to live in city places is a crime. In highly populated areas, the risk of encountering a crowd is much higher than in a small town. Additionally, if the culprit feels protected by the  anonymity  that a large city provides, he may  perpetrate  more wrongdoings. Furthermore, air pollution is also a prevalent issue in major cities. Surface transportation is the  predominan t source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause respiratory problems to the people. This problem is made worse by the  utter  number of vehicles commuting daily in the city.   The government should
Read more