are you belong to nation that listed in a globalized world??

-
Most people accept that e now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that it is beneficial. 
to what extent is globalization a positive or negative development?

In recent times, globalization has been acquired by most people. But, some individuals have not liked this change and thought it is not benevolent for them. Even though there are some negative consequences of the globalized world, but this change become beneficial for most of the age category. Therefore, I think, it is a positive development. 

Sometimes, older age groups people are more possessive and they are wholly attached to religion and culture. In modernization, these things are changed gradually. After some time, such belief and culture will reach the extinct level and remove these things from the world in the future. Therefore, this age group claims to globalization and in their opinion, this is maybe the only reason that helps to remove the culture and religion from the country. Like in Canada, most of the people are Punjabi and there, they enjoy foreign festivals and culture instead of their religious principle. They do not know the history and Saints of Punjab. On these things, older people burst weeping over the situation.

However, globalization has more positive sides such as development, industrialization and so on. This rate is happened due to modernization. This development makes connections, transit, and etcetera easy everything in the world. In ancient times, people have less choice of interaction and conveying systems. Now, these days individuals enjoy a good lifestyle and people use infrastructure to do some regular activities. As a result, people think, it is a positive development for them. 

To conclude, even if there are adverse outcomes, but a globalized environment has become more significant in today’s lifestyle. 

Popular posts from this blog

Accommodation and transport problems

-
  Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? In the modernization era, many problems occur in metropolitan cities like accommodation and transport. The movement of an organization from urban to rural areas has become the solution to eradicate such issues. There are a lot of positive and negative outcomes of this. On the one side, it is ridiculous to say that any business can shift from an urban area to the countryside without facing any loss. Firstly, this change may cost a firm due to a reduction in the quality of its workforce. Not each employee is willing to resettle or work there. And they prefer seeking another career in the large city to maintain their current living standards. The enterprises would have to hire local workers who are, indeed,  less competent. The expenses for the mandatory training courses are significant to them. But an improvement in their prof
Read more

a lot of buildings

-
  Nowadays, a lot of buildings, such as offices and schools, are now being built with an open plan design.  Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development? In the present era, the majority of education institutes and offices would form with open-space floor plans in their premises rather than having individual cabinet rooms. This idea is to be invited because of its pros. But, I will explain the positive and adverse effects of such development. The main reason for the open floor structure because of its cost-effectiveness. Therefore, all recommended these types of plans by organizations and institutions. A huge investment is involved in constructing separate cabinets, and in an open design, only the furniture is to be setup. This furnishing works will incur only fewer expenses. Furthermore, such a structure at offices will eliminate the discrimination of staff members. All the staff members irrespective of their grades should sit together at the same place. This a
Read more

big cities face several problems

-
People living in big cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns?   In recent times, most people like to live in urban areas. Individuals of the  metropolitan  city face various difficulties like crime, pollution, and health disease. From my perspective, the government should apply some norms to mitigate the preceding problems. The  predominant  cause to live in city places is a crime. In highly populated areas, the risk of encountering a crowd is much higher than in a small town. Additionally, if the culprit feels protected by the  anonymity  that a large city provides, he may  perpetrate  more wrongdoings. Furthermore, air pollution is also a prevalent issue in major cities. Surface transportation is the  predominan t source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause respiratory problems to the people. This problem is made worse by the  utter  number of vehicles commuting daily in the city.   The government should
Read more